Free access
Issue
Apidologie
Volume 34, Number 6, November-December 2003
Page(s) 577 - 584
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:2003051
References of  Apidologie 34 (2003) 577-584
  • Berg S. (1991) Investigation on rates of large and small drones at a drone congregation area, Apidologie 22, 437-438.
  • Berg S. (1992) Der Reproduktionserfolg von Drohnen (Apis mellifera L.) unterschiedlicher Größe, Ph.D. Thesis Johann-Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main.
  • Berg S., Koeniger N. (1990) Larger drones (Apis mellifera) have more offspring, in: Proc. German Zoological Society, 83rd Meeting, Frankfurt am Main, Gustav Fischer Verlag, p. 614.
  • Berg S., Koeniger N., Koeniger G., Fuchs S. (1997) Body size and reproductive success of drones (Apis mellifera L.), Apidologie 28, 449-460.
  • Cremer S., Sledge M.F., Heinze J. (2002) Chemical mimicry - Male ants disguised by the queen's bouquet, Nature 419, 897.
  • Dietz A. (1992) Honey bees of the world, in: Graham J.M. (Ed.), The hive and the honeybee, Dadant and Sons, Hamilton, Illinois, pp. 23-71.
  • Duay P., De Jong D., Engels W. (2002) Decreased flight performance and sperm production in drones of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) slightly infested by Varroa destructor mites during pupal development, Gen. Mol. Res. 1, 227-232.
  • Elbassiouny A.M.M. (1992) Comparative studies on the carniolan honey bee race and its crosses, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Plant Protection Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Kairo, Egypt.
  • Fortelius W., Pamilo P., Rosengren R., Sundström L. (1987) Male size dimorphism and alternative reproductive tactics in Formica exsecta ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), Ann. Zool. Fennici 24, 45-54.
  • Franck P., Solignac M., Vautrin D., Cornuet J.M., Koeniger G., Koeniger N. (2002) Sperm competition and last-male precedence in the honeybee, Anim. Behav. 64, 503-509  [CROSSREF link].
  • Gontarski H. (1938) Beobachtungen an eierlegenden Arbeiterinnen, Dtsch. Imkerführ. 12, 107-113.
  • Haberl M., Tautz D. (1998) Sperm usage in honey bees, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42, 247-255  [CROSSREF link].
  • Hamilton W.D. (1979) Wingless and fighting males in fig wasps and other insects, in: Blum M.S., Blum N.A. (Eds.), Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, Academic Press, New York, pp. 167-220.
  • Hölldobler B., Wilson E.O. (1990) The Ants, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
  • Hunt G.J., Guzmán-Novoa E., Fondrk M.K., Page R.E. Jr. (1998) Quantitative trait loci for honey bee stinging behavior and body size, Genetics 148, 1203-1213  [PUBMED link].
  • Jarolimek J.P., Otis G.W. (2001) A comparison of fitness components in large and small honeybee drones, Am. Bee J. 12, 891-892.
  • Judson O. (2002) Dr. Tatiana's sex advice to all creation, Chatto & Windus, London, pp. 76-92.
  • Koeniger G. (1990) The role of mating sign in honey bees, Apis mellifera L.: does it hinder or promote multiple mating?, Anim. Behav. 39, 444-449.
  • Koeniger N. (1970) Factors determining the laying of drone and worker eggs by the honeybee queen, Bee World 51, 166-169.
  • Koeniger G., Koeniger N., Fabritius M. (1979) Some detailed observations of mating in the honeybee, Bee World 60, 53-57.
  • Kukuk P.F., Schwarz M. (1988) Macrocephalic male bees as functional reproductives and probable guards, Pan-Pacific Entomol. 64, 131-137.
  • Michener C.D. (2000) The bees of the world, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  • Moritz R.F.A. (1981) Der Einfluss der Inzucht auf die Fitness der Drohnen von Apis mellifera carnica, Apidologie 12, 41-55.
  • Moritz R.F.A. (1989) Durchführung der Besamung, in: Moritz R.F.A. (Ed.), Die instrumentelle Besamung der Bienenkönigin, Apimonda, Bukarest, pp. 73-95.
  • Neumann P., Moritz R.F.A. (2000) Testing genetic variance hypotheses for the evolution of polyandry in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.), Insectes Soc. 47, 271-279.
  • Page R.E. Jr. (1986) Sperm utilization in social insects, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 31, 297-320  [CROSSREF link].
  • Page R.E. Jr., Erickson E.H. Jr. (1988) Reproduction by worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.), Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 23, 117-126.
  • Palmer K.A., Oldroyd B.P., Franck P., Hadisoesilo S. (2001) Very high paternity frequency in Apis nigrocincta, Insectes Soc. 48, 327-332.
  • Rinderer T.E., Collins A.M., Pesante D. (1985) A comparison of Africanized and European drones: weights, mucus gland and seminal vesicle weights, and counts of spermatozoa, Apidologie 16, 407-412.
  • Rinderer T.E., de Guzman L.I., Lancaster V.A., Delatte G.T., Stelzer J.A. (1999) Varroa in the mating yard: The effect of Varroa jacobsoni and Apistan on drone honey bees, Am. Bee J. 139, 134-139.
  • Ruttner F. (1988) Biogeography and taxonomy of honeybees, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
  • StatSoft I (2001) STATISTICA für Windows, StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK.
  • Tasei J.N., Moinard C., Moreau L., Himpens B., Guyonnaud S. (1998) Relationships between aging, mating, and sperm production in captive Bombus terrestris, J. Apic. Res. 37, 107-113.
  • Thornhill R., Alcock J. (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems, iUnivers.com, Inc., San Jose, New York, Lincoln, Shanghai.
  • Woyke J. (1960) Naturalne i sztuczne unasienianie matek pszczelich, [Natural and instrumental insemination of queen bees], Pszcz. Zesz. Nauk. 4, 183-275.
  • Yamauchi K., Oguchi S., Nakamura Y., Suetake H., Kawada N., Kinomura K. (2001) Mating behavior of dimorphic reproductives of the ponerine ant, Hypoponera nubatama, Insectes Soc. 48, 83-87.