Free access
Issue
Apidologie
Volume 36, Number 2, April-June 2005
the neglected gender - males in bees
Page(s) 157 - 167
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido:2005008
Published online 01 June 2005
References of Apidologie 36 157-167
  • Alford D.V. (1975) Bumblebees, Davis-Poynter, London.
  • Baer B. (2003) Bumblebees as model organisms to study male sexual selection in social insects, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 54, 521-533 [CrossRef].
  • Baer B., Boomsma J.J. (2004) Male reproductive investment and queen mating frequency in fungus growing ants, Behav. Ecol. 15, 426-432 [CrossRef].
  • Baer B., Schmid-Hempel P. (2000) The artificial insemination of bumblebee queens, Insectes Soc. 47, 183-187.
  • Baer B., Schmid-Hempel P. (2001) Unexpected consequences of polyandry for parasitism and fitness in the bumblebee B. terrestris, Evolution 55, 1639-1643.
  • Baer B., Maile R., Schmid-Hempel P., Morgan E.D., Jones G.R. (2000) Chemistry of a mating plug in bumblebees, J. Chem. Ecol. 26, 1869-1875 [CrossRef].
  • Baer B., Morgan E.D., Schmid-Hempel P. (2001) A non-specific fatty acid within the bumblebee mating plug prevents females from remating, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3926-3928 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  • Birkhead T.R., Moller A.P. (1998) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, Academic Press, New York.
  • Boomsma J.J., Baer B., Heinze J. (2005) The evolution of male traits in social insects, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 50, 395-420 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  • Boomsma J.J., Ratnieks F.L.W. (1996) Paternity in eusocial Hymenoptera, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 351, 947-975.
  • Brown M.J.F., Baer B., Schmid Hempel R., Schmid Hempel P. (2002) Dynamics of multiple-mating in the bumble bee Bombus hypnorum, Insectes Soc. 49, 315-319.
  • Brown M.J.F., Schmid Hempel R., Schmid Hempel P. (2003) Queen-controlled sex ratios and worker reproduction in the bumble bee Bombus hypnorum, as revealed by microsatellites, Mol. Ecol. 12, 1599-1605 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  • Cumber R.A. (1953) Some aspects of the biology and ecology of humble-bees bearing upon the yields of red-clover seed in New Zealand, N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 34, 227-240.
  • Duvoisin N., Baer B., Schmid-Hempel P. (1999) Sperm transfer and male competition in a bumblebee, Anim. Behav. 58, 743-749 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  • Eberhard W.G. (1985) Sexual selection and animal genitalia, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  • Eberhard W.G., Cordero C. (1995) Sexual selection by cryptic female choice on male seminal products. A new bridge between sexual selection and reproductive physiology, Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 493-496 [CrossRef].
  • Engels E., Engels W. (1988) Age dependent queen attractiveness for drones and mating in the stingless bee Scaptotrigona postica, J. Apic. Res. 27, 3-8.
  • Estoup A., Scholl A., Pouvreau A., Solignac M. (1995) Monoandry and polyandry in bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Bombinae) as evidenced by highly variable microsatellites, Mol. Ecol. 4, 89-93 [PubMed].
  • Foster R.L. (1992) Nestmate recognition as an inbreeding avoidance mechanism in bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae), J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 65, 238-243.
  • Garofalo C.A., Zucchi R., Muccillo G. (1986) Reproductive studies of a neotropical bumblebee, Bombus atratus (Hymenoptera, Apidae), Rev. Brasil. Genet. 9, 231-243
  • Katayama E. (1964) Observations on the later stages of Bombus ardens Smith (Hymenoptera, Apidae), Kontyu 32, 393-402.
  • Koeniger N., Koeniger G. (1991) An evolutionary approach to mating behaviour and drone copulatory organs in Apis, Apidologie 22, 581-590.
  • Mikheyev A.S. (2003) Evidence for mating plugs in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta, Insectes Soc. 50, 401-402 [CrossRef].
  • Paxton R.J., Thorén P.A., Estoup A., Tengö J. (2001) Queen-worker conflict over male production and sex ratio in a facultatively polyandrous bumble bee, Bombus hypnorum: the consequences of nest usurpation, Mol. Ecol. 10, 2489-2498 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  • Payne C.M., Laverty T.M., Lachance M.A. (2003) The frequency of multiple paternity in bumble bee (Bombus) colonies based on microsatellite DNA at the B10 locus, Insectes Soc. 50, 375-378 [CrossRef].
  • Postner M. (1953) Kopulationsverhalten bei den Gattungen Bombus und Psithyrus (Apidae, Hymenoptera), Zool. Anz. 151, 300-306.
  • Pouvreau A. (1963) Observations sur l'accouplement de Bombus hypnorum L. (Hyménoptère, Apidae) en serre, Insectes Soc. 10, 111-118.
  • Röseler P.-F. (1973) Die Anzahl der Spermien im Receptaculum Seminis von Hummelköniginnen (Hym., Apoidea, Bombinae), Apidologie 4, 267-274.
  • Sauter A., Brown M.J.F. (2001) To copulate or not? The importance of female status and behavioural variation in predicting copulation in a bumblebee, Anim. Behav. 62, 221-226 [CrossRef].
  • Sauter A., Brown M.J.F., Baer B., Schmid-Hempel P. (2001) Males of social insects can prevent queens from multiple mating, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 1449-1454 [CrossRef].
  • Schmid-Hempel R., Schmid-Hempel P. (2000) Female mating frequencies in Bombus spp. from Central Europe, Insectes Soc. 47, 36-41 [CrossRef].
  • Simmons L.W. (2001) Sperm Competition and Its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects, Princeton University Press, Oxford.
  • Tasei J.N., Moinard C., Moreau L., Himpens B., Guyonnaud S. (1998) Relationship between aging, mating and sperm production in captive Bombus terrestris, J. Apic. Res. 37, 107-113.
  • van Honk C.G.J., Velthuis H.H.W., Röseler P.-F. (1978) A sex pheromone from the mandibular glands in bumblebee queens, Experientia 34, 838-839.
  • von Hagen E. (2003) Hummeln, Fauna Verlag, Nottuln.
  • Winston M.L. (1991) The biology of the honey bee, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.