Repellent foraging scent recognition across bee families
Apidologie, 36 3 (2005) 325-330
Published online: 2005-07-07
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
331 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76742-5_11
Social learning in non‐grouping animals
Mike M. WebsterBiological Reviews 98 (4) 1329 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12954
Bumble Bee Avoidance of Argentine Ants and Associated Chemical Cues
Michelle Constanza Miner and Erin E. Wilson RankinJournal of Insect Behavior 36 (1) 20 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-023-09815-w
Flower sharing and pollinator health: a behavioural perspective
E. Nicholls, S. A. Rands, C. Botías and N. Hempel de IbarraPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 377 (1853) (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0157
(2022)
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98871
Pollinator behaviour and resource limitation maintain honest floral signalling
Anina C. Knauer, Hanna Kokko and Florian P. SchiestlFunctional Ecology 35 (11) 2536 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13905
The ultraviolet colour component enhances the attractiveness of red flowers of a bee-pollinated plant
Yang Niu, Hang Sun, Chang-Qiu Liu, Zhe Chen and Andreas SchuldtJournal of Plant Ecology 13 (3) 354 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtaa023
Intraspecific variation in body size of bumblebee workers influences anti‐predator behaviour
Sabrina S. Gavini, Carolina Quintero, Mariana Tadey and Julian ResascoJournal of Animal Ecology 89 (2) 658 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13135
Differential Feeding Responses of Several Bee Species to Sugar Sources Containing Iridomyrmecin, an Argentine Ant Trail Pheromone Component
Erin E. Wilson Rankin, Jacob M. Cecala, Nohely Hernandez Pineda, Qian Yue Lu, Erika Pelayo and Dong-Hwan ChoeJournal of Insect Behavior 33 (2-4) 83 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-020-09748-8
Bumblebees can discriminate between scent-marks deposited by conspecifics
Richard F. Pearce, Luca Giuggioli and Sean A. RandsScientific Reports 7 (1) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43872
The European wool-carder bee (Anthidium manicatum) eavesdrops on plant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during trichome collection
Kelsey K. Graham, Steve Brown, Stephanie Clarke, Ursula S.R. Röse and Philip T. StarksBehavioural Processes 144 5 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2017.08.005
Sublethal exposure to neonicotinoids and related side effects on insect pollinators: honeybees, bumblebees, and solitary bees
Abdulrahim T. Alkassab and Wolfgang H. KirchnerJournal of Plant Diseases and Protection 124 (1) 1 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-016-0041-0
82 225 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.abr.2016.10.004
Stingless bees (Melipona scutellaris) learn to associate footprint cues at food sources with a specific reward context
Ana Carolina Roselino, André Vieira Rodrigues and Michael HrncirJournal of Comparative Physiology A 202 (9-10) 657 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-016-1104-1
Linking Pollination Effectiveness and Interspecific Displacement Success in Bees
M Ali, S Saeed, A Sajjad and A AkbarNeotropical Entomology 44 (2) 101 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-014-0259-0
Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates
L. W. Pisa, V. Amaral-Rogers, L. P. Belzunces, J. M. Bonmatin, C. A. Downs, D. Goulson, D. P. Kreutzweiser, C. Krupke, M. Liess, M. McField, C. A. Morrissey, D. A. Noome, J. Settele, N. Simon-Delso, J. D. Stark, J. P. Van der Sluijs, H. Van Dyck and M. WiemersEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research 22 (1) 68 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3471-x
Chemical Ecology of Bumble Bees
Manfred Ayasse and Stefan JarauAnnual Review of Entomology 59 (1) 299 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-161949
Honey bees and bumble bees respond differently to inter- and intra-specific encounters
Shelley R. Rogers, Peter Cajamarca, David R. Tarpy and Hannah J. BurrackApidologie (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-013-0210-0
Asiatic Honeybee Apis cerana
Dharam P. AbrolAsiatic Honeybee Apis cerana 367 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6928-1_11
Social but not solitary bees reject dangerous flowers where a conspecific has recently been attacked
Ana L. Llandres, Francisco G. Gonzálvez and Miguel A. Rodríguez-GironésAnimal Behaviour 85 (1) 97 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.10.012
Chemical Compounds Related to the Predation Risk Posed by Malacophagous Ground Beetles Alter Self-Maintenance Behavior of Naive Slugs (Deroceras reticulatum)
Piotr Bursztyka, Dominique Saffray, Céline Lafont-Lecuelle, et al.PLoS ONE 8 (11) e79361 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079361
The differential response of workers and queens of the ant Lasius niger to an environment marked by workers: Ants dislike the unknown
Cédric Devigne and Jean-Christophe de BiseauBehavioural Processes 91 (3) 275 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2012.09.008
Neural effects of insecticides in the honey bee
Luc P. Belzunces, Sylvie Tchamitchian and Jean-Luc BrunetApidologie 43 (3) 348 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-012-0134-0
Floral visitors and ant scent marks: noticed but not used?
GAVIN BALLANTYNE and PAT WILLMEREcological Entomology 37 (5) 402 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2012.01378.x
Recognition of scent marks in solitary bees to avoid previously visited flowers
Tomoyuki Yokoi and Kenji FujisakiEcological Research 24 (4) 803 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-008-0551-8
Hydrocarbon Footprints as a Record of Bumblebee Flower Visitation
Sebastian Witjes and Thomas EltzJournal of Chemical Ecology 35 (11) 1320 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-009-9720-7
Inadvertent social information in foraging bumblebees: effects of flower distribution and implications for pollination
Mathilde Baude, Isabelle Dajoz and Étienne DanchinAnimal Behaviour 76 (6) 1863 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.010
Foraging scent marks of bumblebees: footprint cues rather than pheromone signals
Jessica Wilms and Thomas EltzNaturwissenschaften 95 (2) 149 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-007-0298-z
Influence of scent deposits on flower choice: experiments in an artificial flower array with bumblebees
Sebastian Witjes and Thomas EltzApidologie 38 (1) 12 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2006048
Osmia bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) can detect nectar-rewarding flowers using olfactory cues
Anna D. Howell and Ruben AlarcónAnimal Behaviour 74 (2) 199 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.11.012
Repellent scent-marking behaviour of the sweat beeHalictus(Seladonia)aerariusduring flower foraging
Tomoyuki Yokoi and Kenji FujisakiApidologie 38 (5) 474 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2007034
Social Learning in Insects — From Miniature Brains to Consensus Building
Ellouise Leadbeater and Lars ChittkaCurrent Biology 17 (16) R703 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.012
The use of heterospecific scent marks by the sweat bee Halictus aerarius
Tomoyuki Yokoi, Dave Goulson and Kenji FujisakiNaturwissenschaften 94 (12) 1021 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-007-0285-4
The importance of experience in the interpretation of conspecific chemical signals
Nehal Saleh and Lars ChittkaBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61 (2) 215 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0252-7
Tracing Pollinator Footprints on Natural Flowers
Thomas EltzJournal of Chemical Ecology 32 (5) 907 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-006-9055-6