Free Access
Issue |
Apidologie
Volume 25, Number 6, 1994
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 557 - 565 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:19940606 |
Apidologie 25 (1994) 557-565
DOI: 10.1051/apido:19940606
a Department of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, 6140 South Africa
b Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, 6140 South Africa
Key words: Apis mellifera capensis / Apis mellifera scutellata / hybridization / sting pheromone
DOI: 10.1051/apido:19940606
Introgression between Apis mellifera capensis Escholtz and Apis mellifera scutellata Lepeletier: the sting pheromones
H.R. Hepburna, G.E. Jonesa and R. Kirbyba Department of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, 6140 South Africa
b Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, 6140 South Africa
Abstract - The 8 principal components of the alarm pheromone from the stings of guard bees from natural populations of Apis mellifera capensis and A m scutellata and areas of hybridization were analysed by gas chromatography. A m scutellata produces significantly more secretion than A m capensis. Autocorrelation analyses of intercolonical variance indicates regions of significant variation in these traits. This introgression coincides with hybridization zones previously defined by other variables. Introgression intensity is related to relative honeybee population density and reveals a probable cyclical bottleneck in 1 area generated by climatic oscillations.
Key words: Apis mellifera capensis / Apis mellifera scutellata / hybridization / sting pheromone