Issue |
Apidologie
Volume 33, Number 2, March-April 2002
The Cape honeybee ( |
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 215 - 232 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2002003 |
Apidologie 33 (2002) 215-232
DOI: 10.1051/apido:2002003
Usurpation of African Apis mellifera scutellata colonies by parasitic Apis mellifera capensis workers
Stephen Martina, Theresa Wosslerb and Per Krygerba Laboratory of Apiculture and Social Insect, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK
b Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa
(Received 1 November 2001; revised 12 December 2001; accepted 19 December 2001)
Abstract
Thelytokous Apis mellifera capensis workers recently brought into regions
occupied by the arrkenotokous African bee A. m. scutellata, parasitise
these colonies, causing colony death. These capensis workers are genetically
almost identical and are referred to as a `pseudo-clone'. We surveyed 120 scutellata
colonies, 27 in detail, at various stages of usurpation by the pseudo-clone.
The scutellata queen could co-exist with egg-laying pseudo-clones for 50+ days
in one case but disappeared 1-15 days in three other cases. Despite the presence
of emerged queen cells no new adult queens of either race were observed in usurped
colonies. Only 11
13% of the pseudo-clone population had fully active ovaries,
suggesting ovarian development is inhibited in the majority of the pseudo-clones.
Only 2.7
1.7% of the foraging force were pseudo-clones. The data were modelled
and showed the rapid (56-105 days) growth of the pseudo-clone population and colony
death over a wide range of initial conditions.
Key words: Apis mellifera capensis / pseudo-clone / usurpation / reproduction / Apis mellifera scutellata / honeybee reproduction / South Africa
Correspondence and reprints: Stephen Martin
e-mail: s.j.martin@sheffield.ac.uk
© INRA, EDP Sciences, DIB, AGIB 2002