Issue |
Apidologie
Volume 34, Number 6, November-December 2003
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 525 - 533 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2003043 |
DOI: 10.1051/apido:2003043
Response of the small hive beetle (Aethina tumida) to honey bee (Apis mellifera) and beehive-produced volatiles
Alonso Suazo, Baldwyn Torto, Peter E.A. Teal and James H. TumlinsonCenter for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, 1600/1700 SW 23rd Drive, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
(Received 15 October 2002; revised 18 February 2003; accepted 20 February 2003)
Abstract
The response of male and female Small Hive Beetle (SHB), Aethina tumida, to air-borne
volatiles from adult worker bees, (Apis mellifera), pollen, unripe honey, beeswax, wax by-products
("slumgum"), and bee brood, was investigated in olfactometric and flight-tunnel choice bioassays. In both
bioassay systems, males and females responded strongly to the volatiles from worker bees, freshly collected
pollen and slumgum but not to those from commercially available pollen, beeswax and bee brood. The
response to pollen volatiles was dose dependent, while response to volatiles from worker bees increased
with both the number and age of the bees. Females were more responsive than males to the different volatile
sources, with greater response in tests with unripe honey. In flight-tunnel choice tests, Super Q-trapped
volatiles from worker bees elicited a response comparable to the response to living workers, while trapped
volatiles from other sources were not attractive.
Key words: small hive beetle / Aethina tumida / hive volatiles / olfactometer / flight-tunnel
Correspondence and reprints: James H. Tumlinson jtumlinson@gainesville.usda.ufl.edu
© INRA, EDP Sciences, DIB, AGIB 2003