Free Access
Issue
Apidologie
Volume 31, Number 2, March-April 2000
Taxonomy and Evolutionary biology of the Honeybees
Page(s) 223 - 233
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2000118

References

1
Allen M.D., Respiration of worker honeybees of different ages at different temperatures, J. Exp. Biol. 36 (1959) 92-101.
2
Arnold G., Quenet J.M., Masson C., De Schepper B., Estoup A., Gasqui P., Kin recognition in honeybees, Nature 379 (1996) 498.
3
Bonabeau E., Theraulaz G., Deneubourg J.-L., Aron S., Camazine S., Self-organization in social insects, Trends Ecol. Evol. 12 (1997) 188-193.
4
Boomsma J.J.C., Ratnieks F.L.W., Paternity in eusocial Hymenoptera, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351 (1996) 941-957.
5
Breed M.D., Chemical cues in kin recognition: criteria for identification, experimental approa-ches, and the honeybee as an example, in: Vander Meer R.K., Breed M.D., Winston M.L., Espelie K.E. (Eds.), Pheromone Communication in Social Insects, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1998, pp. 57-78.
6
Breed M.D., Velthuis H.H.W., Robinson G.E., Do worker honeybees discriminate among unrelated and related larvae phenotypes? Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 77 (1984) 737-739.
7
Breed M.D., Welch C.K., Cruz R., Kin discrimination within honeybee colonies: an analysis of the evidence, Behav. Process. 33 (1994) 25-40.
8
Camazine S., Self-organizing pattern formation on the combs of honeybee colonies, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28 (1991) 61-76.
9
Camazine S., Sneyd J., A model of collective nectar source selection by honey bees: self-organization through simple rules, J. Theor. Biol. 149 (1991) 547-571.
10
Carlin N., Frumhoff P., Nepotism in the honeybee, Nature 346 (1990) 706.
11
Detrain C., Pasteels J., Deneubourg J., Information Processing in Social Insects, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, 1999.
12
de Vries H., Biesmeijer J.C., Modelling collective foraging by means of individual behavior rules in honeybees, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 44 (1998) 109-129.
13
Frumhoff P.C., Schneider S., The social consequences of honeybee polyandry: the effects of kinship on worker interactions within colonies, Anim. Behav. 35 (1987) 255-262.
14
Fuchs S., Moritz R.F.A., Evolution of extreme polyandry in the honeybee, Apis mellifera L., Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 45 (1999) 269-275.
15
Getz W.M., The honey bee as a model kin recognition system, in: Hepper P.G. (Ed.), Kin Recognition, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991, pp. 358-412.
16
Getz W.M., Smith K.B., Olfactory sensitivity and discrimination of mixtures in the honeybee, J. Comp. Physiol. A 160 (1987) 239-245.
17
Grafen A., Do animals really recognize kin? Anim. Behav. 39 (1990) 42-44.
18
Hepburn H.R., Reece S., Neumann P., Moritz R.F.A., Radloff S.E., Absconding in honeybees (Apis mellifera) in relation to queen status and mode of worker reproduction, Insectes Soc. 46 (1999) 323-326.
19
Keller L., Indiscriminate altruism: unduly nice parents and siblings, Trends Ecol. Evol. 12 (1997) 99-103.
20
Kryger P., Moritz R.F.A., Lack of kin recognition in swarming honeybees, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40 (1997) 271-276.
21
Lindauer M., Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Arbeitsteilung im Bienenstaat, Z. Vergl. Physiol. 36 (1952) 299-345.
22
Moritz R.F.A., Kin recognition in honeybees: experimental artefact or biological reality?, in: Goodman L.J., Fisher R.C. (Eds.), The Behaviour and Physiology of Honeybees, CAB International, Oxon, UK, 1991, pp. 48-59.
23
Moritz R.F.A., Crewe R.M., Chemical signals of queens in kin recognition of honeybees (Apis mellifera. L.), J. Comp. Physiol. A 164 (1988) 83-89.
24
Moritz R.F.A., Heilser T., Super- and half-sister discrimination by honeybee workers (Apis mellifera) in a trophallactic bioassay, Insectes Soc. 39 (1992) 365-372.
25
Moritz R.F.A., Southwick E.E., Bees as Superorganisms - An Evolutionary Reality, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 1992.
26
Moritz R.F.A., Kryger P., Self-organization of circadian rhythms in groups of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.), Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34 (1994) 211-215.
27
Moritz R.F.A., Kryger P., Allsopp M., Competition for royalty in bees, Nature 384 (1996) 31.
28
Moritz R.F.A., Fuchs S., Organization of honeybee colonies: characteristics and consequences of a superorganism concept, Apidologie 29 (1998) 7-21.
29
Moritz R.F.A., Page R.E., Behavioral threshold variability: costs and benefits in insect societies, in: Detrain C., Pasteels J., Deneubourg J. (Eds.), Information Processing in Social Insects, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, 1999, pp. 203-215.
30
Oldroyd B.P., Rinderer T.E., Buco S.M., Honey-bees dance with their super-sisters, Anim. Behav. 42 (1991) 121-129.
31
Page R.E., Robinson G.E., The genetics of division of labor in honeybee colonies, Adv. Insect Physiol. 23 (1991) 117-169.
32
Page R.E., Mitchell S.D., Self-organization and the evolution of division of labor, Apidologie 29 (1998) 171-190.
33
Page R.E., Robinson G.E., Fondrk M.K., Genetic specialists, kin recognition and nepotism in honeybee colonies, Nature 338 (1989) 576-579.
34
Page R.E., Metcalf R.A., Metcalf R.L., Erickson E.H., Lampman R.L., Extractable hydrocarbons and kin recognition in the honeybee, J. Chem. Ecol. 17 (1991) 745-756.
35
Page R.E., Erber J., Fondrk M.K., The effect of genotype on response thresholds to sucrose and foraging behavior of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.), J. Comp. Physiol. 182 (1998) 489-500.
36
Rösch G.A., Über die Bautätigkeit im Bienenvolk und das Alter der Baubienen. Weiterer Beitrag zur Frage nach Arbeitsteilung im Bienenstaat, Z. Vergl. Physiol. 6 (1927) 265-298.
37
Ruttner F., Hesse B., Rassenspezifische Unterschiede in der Ovarentwicklung und Eiablage von weisellosen Arbeiterinnen der Honigbiene Apis mellifera, Apidologie 12 (1981) 159-183.
38
Seeley T.D., Honeybee Ecology. A Study of Adaptation in Social Life, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1985.
39
Seeley T.D., Thoughts of information and integration in honey bee colonies, Apidologie 29 (1998) 67-80.
40
Southwick E.E., Social temperature control and heat production in honey bees, in: Mercer J.B. (Ed.), Thermal Physiology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989, pp. 755-759.
41
Tautz J., Lindauer M., Honeybees establish specific sites on the comb for their waggle dance, J. Comp. Physiol. A 180 (1998) 537-539.
42
Trumbo S.T., Huang Z.Y., Robinson G.E., Division of labor between undertaker specialists and other middle-aged workers in honey bee colonies, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41 (1997) 151-163.


Abstract

Copyright INRA/DIB/AGIB/EDP Sciences