Free Access
Volume 38, Number 5, September-October 2007
Page(s) 411 - 418
Published online 03 August 2007
References of  Apidologie 38 (2007) 411-418
  • Breed M.D. (1998a) Recognition pheromones of the honey bee, Bioscience 48, 463-470 [CrossRef].
  • Breed M.D. (1998b) Chemical cues in kin recognition: Criteria for identification, experimental approaches, and the honey bee as an example, in: Vander Meer R.K., Winston M.L., Espelie K.E., Breed M.D. (Eds.), Chemical communication in social insects, Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 57-78.
  • Breed M.D. (2003) Nestmate recognition assays as a tool for population and ecological studies in eusocial insects: A review, J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 76, 539-550.
  • Breed M.D., Guzmán-Novoa E., Hunt G.J. (2004a) Defensive behavior of honey bees: Organization, genetics, and comparisons with other bees, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 49, 271-298 [PubMed].
  • Breed M.D., Diaz P.H., Lucero K.D. (2004b) Behavioural tests of models for information processing in nestmate recognition by honey bees, Apis mellifera, Anim. Behav. 68, 921-928 [CrossRef].
  • Buchwald R., Breed M.D. (2005) Nestmate recognition cues in a stingless bee, Trigona fulviventris, Anim. Behav. 70, 1331-1337 [CrossRef].
  • Bura E.A., Gamboa G.J. (1994) Kin recognition by social wasps - asymmetric tolerance between aunts and nieces, Anim. Behav. 47, 977-979 [CrossRef].
  • Dani F.R., Jones G.R., Destri S., Spencer S.H., Turillazzi S. (2001) Deciphering the recognition signature within the cuticular chemical profile of paper wasps, Anim. Behav. 62, 165-171 [CrossRef].
  • Dani F.R., Foster K.R., Zacchi F., Seppa P., Massolo A., Carelli A., Arevalo E., Queller D.C., Strassmann J.E., Turillazzi S. (2004) Can cuticular lipids provide sufficient information for within-colony nepotism in wasps? Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B-Biol. Sci. 271, 745-753.
  • Downs S.G., Ratnieks F.L.W. (2000) Adaptive shifts in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) guarding behavior support predictions of the acceptance threshold model, Behav. Ecol. 11, 326-333 [CrossRef].
  • Gamboa G.J., Reeve H.K., Holmes W.G. (1991) Conceptual issues and methodology in kin-recognition research - a critical discussion, Ethology 88, 109-127.
  • Greenberg L. (1988) Kin recognition in the sweat bee, Lasioglossum zephyrum, Behav. Genet. 18, 425-438 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  • Guzmán-Novoa E., Hunt G.J., Uribe J.L., Smith C., Arechavaleta-Velasco M.E. (2002) Confirmation of QTL effects and evidence of genetic dominance of honeybee defensive behavior: Results of colony and individual behavioral assays, Behav. Genet. 32 95-102.
  • Koeniger N., Vorwohl G. (1979) Competition for food among 4 sympatric species of Apini in Sri Lanka (Apis dorsata, Apis cerana, Apis florea and Trigona iridipennis), J. Apic. Res. 18, 95-109.
  • Koeniger N., Koeniger G., Gries M., Tingek S., Kelitu A. (1996) Observations on colony defense of Apis nuluensis Tingek, and predatory behavior of the hornet, Vespa multimaculata Perez, 1910, Apidologie 27, 341-352 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences].
  • Lenoir A., d'Ettorre P., Errard C., Hefetz A. (2001a) Chemical ecology and social parasitism in ants, Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46, 573-599 [PubMed].
  • Lenoir A., Hefetz A., Simon T., Soroker V. (2001b) Comparative dynamics of gestalt odour formation in two ant species Camponotus fellah and Aphaenogaster senilis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Physiol. Entomol. 26, 275-283.
  • Liang D., Silverman J. (2000) "You are what you eat": Diet modifies cuticular hydrocarbons and nestmate recognition in the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, Naturwissenschaften 87, 412-416 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  • Moore A.J., Breed M.D., Moor M.J. (1987) The guard honey-bee: ontogeny and behavioral variability of workers performing a specialized task, Anim. Behav. 35, 1159-1167 [CrossRef].
  • Oldroyd B.P., Wongsiri S. (2006) Asian honey bees: biology, conservation, and human interactions, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  • Pirk C.W.W., Hepburn R., Radloff S.E., Erlandsson J. (2002) Defense posture in the dwarf honeybee, Apis florae, Apidologie 33, 289-294 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences].
  • Reeve H.K. (1989) The evolution of conspecific acceptance thresholds, Am. Nat. 133, 407-435 [CrossRef].
  • Roulston T.H., Buczkowski G., Silverman, J. (2003) Nestmate discrimination in ants: effect of bioassay on aggressive behavior, Insectes Soc. 50, 151-159 [CrossRef].
  • Sasagawa H., Kadowski T., Matsuyama S., Hirai Y., Peng C.Y.S. (2002) Semiochemically mediated recognition in honey bee societies, Proc. XIV Congr. IUSSI, p. 15.
  • Seeley T.D., Seeley R.H., Akratanakul P. (1982) Colony defense strategies of the honey bees in Thailand, Ecol. Monogr. 52, 43-63 [CrossRef].
  • Shim S.M., Santerre C.R., Burgess J.R., Deardorff D.C. (2003) Omega-3 fatty acids and total polychlorinated biphenyls in 26 dietary supplements, J. Food Sci. 68, 2436-2440.
  • Smith D.R., Palmer M.R., Otis G., Damus M. (2003) Mitochondrial DNA and AFLP markers support species status of Apis nigrocincta, Insectes Soc. 50, 185-190 [CrossRef].
  • Starks P.T., Watson R.E., Dipaola M.J., Dipaola C.P. (1998) The effect of queen number on nestmate discrimination in the facultatively polygynous ant Pseudomyrmex pallidus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Ethology 104, 573-584.
  • Starks P.T., Ed. (2004) Recognition Systems, Ann. Zool. Fennici 41, 689-892.
  • Tanaka H., Roubik D.W., Kato M., Liew F., Gunsalam G. (2001) Phylogenetic position of Apis nuluensis of northern Borneo and phylogeography of A. cerana as inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences, Insectes Soc. 48, 44-51 [CrossRef].
  • Tsutsui N.D., Suarez A.V., Grosberg R.K. (2003) Genetic diversity, asymmetrical aggression, and recognition in a widespread invasive species, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1078-1083 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  • Vander Meer R.K. Winston M.L., Espelie K.E., Breed M.D. (Eds.) (1998) Chemical communication in social insects, Westview Press, Boulder.
  • Vander Meer R.M., Morel L. (1998) Nestmate recognition in ants, in: Vander Meer R.K., Winston M.L., Espelie K.E., Breed M.D. (Eds.), Chemical communication in social insects, Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 79-103.