Free Access
Volume 40, Number 2, March-April 2009
Page(s) 184 - 191
Published online 03 April 2009
References of  Apidologie 40 (2009) 184–191
  • Adlakha R.L., Sharma O.P. (1971) Interspecific introduction of queens (Apis mellifera queens into A. indica nuclei), Proc 23rd Int. Apic. Congr., Moscow, Apimondia, p. 402.
  • Aichholz R., Lorbeer E., Hüttinger E. (2000) The chemical compounds of beeswax from Apis species, Proc. 4th Asian Apic. Assoc. Conf., Kathmandu, pp. 152–154.
  • Alexander B.A. (1991) A cladistic analysis of the genus Apis, in: Smith D.R. (Ed.), Diversity of the Genus Apis, Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 1–28.
  • Arias M.C., Sheppard W.S. (2005) Phylogenetic relationships of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apinae: Apini) inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequence data, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 37, 25–35 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  • Atwal A.S., Sharma O.P. (1967) The introduction of Apis mellifera queens into Apis indica colonies and the associated behavior of the two species, Proc. 21st Int. Beekeep. Congr. Prelim. Mtg. Summary paper 70, 77.
  • Ayasse M., Paxton R.J. (2002) Brood protection in social insects, in: Hilker M., Meinders T. (Eds.), Chemoecology of insect eggs and egg deposition, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 117–148.
  • Bethe A. (1898) Should we credit ants and honeybees with personality traits?, Pflug. Arch. Ges. Physiol. 70, 15–100 [CrossRef] [in German].
  • Breed M.D. (1998) Recognition pheromones of the honey bee, BioSciences 48, 463–470 [CrossRef].
  • Breed M.D., Stiller T.M. (1992) Honey bee, Apis mellifera, nestmate discrimination: hydrocarbon effects and the evolutionary implications of comb choice, Anim. Behav. 43, 875–883 [CrossRef].
  • Breed M.D., Williams K.R., Fewell J.H. (1988) Comb wax mediates the acquisition of nest-mate recognition cues in honey bees, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 85, 8766–8769 [CrossRef].
  • Breed M.D., Page R.E., Hibbard B.E., Bjostad L.K.B. (1995) Interfamily variation in comb wax hydrocarbons produced by honey bees, J. Chem. Ecol. 21, 1329–1338 [CrossRef].
  • Breed M.D., Perry S., Bjostad L.K.B. (2004) Testing the blank slate hypothesis: why honey bee colonies accept young bees, Insectes Soc. 51, 12–16 [CrossRef].
  • D'Ettorre P., Wenseleers T., Dawson J. (2006) Wax combs mediate nestmate recognition by guard honeybees, Anim. Behav. 71, 773–779 [CrossRef].
  • Dhaliwal G.S., Atwal A.S. (1970) Interspecific relations between Apis cerana indica and Apis mellifera, J. Apic. Res. 9, 53–59.
  • Devkota F.R., Thapa R.B. (2005) Foraging preference of Apis cerana F. and Apis mellifera, J. Inst. Agric. Anim. Sci. 26, 167–168.
  • Free J.B. (1987) Pheromones of Social Bees, Chapman and Hall, London.
  • Grout R.A. (Ed.) (1946) The Hive and the Honey Bee, Dadant and Sons, Hamilton.
  • Inoue A. (1962) Preliminary report on the rearing of Japanese honeybee queens in colonies of the European honeybee, Indian Bee J. 24, 73–74.
  • Johnson R.A., Wichern D.W. (2002) Applied multivariate statistical Analysis, 5th Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
  • Katzav-Gozansky T., Soroker V., Kamer J., Schulz C.M., Francke W., Hefetz A. (2003) Ultrastructural and chemical characterization of egg surface of honeybee worker and queen-laid eggs, Chemoecology 13, 129–134 [CrossRef].
  • Koeniger G., Koeniger N., Tingek S. (1994) Cross fostered drones of Apis cerana (Fabricius, 1793) and Apis koschevnikovi (Buttel-Reepen, 1906) fly at their species specific mating times, Insectes Soc. 41, 73–78 [CrossRef].
  • Koeniger N., Koeniger G., Tingek S., Kelitu A. (1996) Interspecific rearing and acceptance of queens between Apis cerana Fabricius, 1793 and Apis koschevnikovi Buttel-Reepen, 1906, Apidologie 27, 371–380 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences].
  • Le Conte Y., Sreng L., Trouiller J. (1994) The recognition of larvae by worker honeybees, Naturwissenschaften 81, 462–465.
  • Le Conte Y., Sreng L., Poitout S.H. (1995) Brood pheromone can modulate the feeding behavior of Apis mellifera workers (Hymenoptera: Apidae), J. Econ. Entomol. 88, 798–804.
  • Martin S.J., Dils V., Billen J. (2005) Morphology of the Dufour gland within the honey bee sting gland complex, Apidologie 36, 543–546 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences].
  • Mori A., D'Ettorre P., Le Moli F. (1996) Selective acceptance of the brood of two formicine slave-making ants by host and non-host related species, Insectes Soc. 43, 391–400 [CrossRef].
  • Moritz R.F.A., Neumann P. (2004) Differences in nestmate recognition for drones and workers in the honeybee. Apis mellifera (L.), Anim. Behav. 67, 681–688.
  • Nakamura J. (1994) Absconding as an adaptive behaviour of the Asian honey bee, Apis cerana, Bull. Fac. Agric. Tamagawa Univ. 34, 81–102 [In Japanese].
  • Nanork, P., Wongsiri, S., Oldroyd B.P. (2007a) Preservation and loss of the honey bee (Apis) egg-marking signal across evolutionary time, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61, 1509–1514 [CrossRef].
  • Nanork P., Chapman N.C., Wongsiri S., Lim J., Gloag R.S., Oldroyd B.P. (2007b) Social parasitism by workers in queenless and queenright Apis cerana colonies, Mol. Ecol. 16, 1107–1114.
  • Neumann P., Moritz R.F.A. (2002) The Cape honeybee phenomenon: the sympatric evolution of a social parasite in real time? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52, 271–281 [CrossRef].
  • Oku N., Ono M. (1990) Preliminary attempts to rear larvae of the Japanese honeybee, Apis cerana japonica, in an Apis mellifera colony and in the laboratory using A. mellifera royal jelly, Honeybee Sci. 11, 121–124 [In Japanese].
  • Oschmann H. (1965) Can Apis mellifica bees rear brood of A. cerana? Die Biene, Giessen 101, 150–151 [In German].
  • Pirk C.W.W., Neumann P., Hepburn H.R. (2007) Nestmate recognition for eggs in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.), Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61, 1685–1693.
  • Potichot S., Wongsiri S., Dietz A. (1993) Attempts in queen rearing of Apis cerana larvae in Apis mellifera colonies and Apis mellifera larvae in Apis cerana colonies, in: Connor L.J., Rinderer T.E., Sylvester H.A., Wongsiri S. (Eds.), Asian Apiculture, Wicwas Press, Cheshire, pp. 128–133.
  • Ratnieks F.L.W. (1992) Evidence for an egg-marking pheromone in the honeybee, Am. Bee J. 132, 813.
  • Ribbands C.R. (1954) The defence of the honeybee community, Proc. R. Soc. B 142, 512–524.
  • Ruttner F. (1988) Biogeography and taxonomy of honeybees, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • Sakagami S. (1959) Some interspecific relations between Japanese and European honeybees, J. Anim. Ecol. 28, 51–68 [CrossRef].
  • Sasaki K., Kitamura H., Obara Y. (2004) Discrimination of larval sex and timing of male brood elimination by workers in honeybees (Apis mellifera L.), Appl. Entomol. Zool. 39, 393–399.
  • Smith D.R. (1991) Mitochondrial DNA and honey bee biogeography, in: Smith D.R. (Ed.), Diversity in the Genus Apis, Westview, Boulder, pp. 131–176.
  • StatSoft Inc. (2007) STATISTICA, version 8.1.
  • Spiewok S., Neumann P., Hepburn H.R. (2006) Preparation for disturbance-induced absconding of Cape honeybee colonies (Apis mellifera capensis Esch.), Insectes Soc. 53, 27–31.
  • Tan K., Hepburn H.R., He S., Radloff S.E., Neumann P., Fang X. (2006) Gigantism in honeybees: Apis cerana queens reared in mixed-species colonies, Naturwissenschaften 93, 315–320 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  • Visscher P.K. (1986) Kinship discrimination in queen rearing by honey bees (Apis mellifera), Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18, 453–460 [CrossRef].